OPPORTUNIST ARTISTS
POLITICAL WIND-CHASERS, AND THE COST OF RELEVANCE
By Thami akaMbongo Manzana
There is a growing pattern in the cultural and creative space where some artists, performers, and public figures position themselves not as independent voices, but as political chameleons constantly shifting alignment depending on where influence, access, or visibility is strongest.
This is not new. It is simply becoming more visible in a digital age where attention is currency, and proximity to power is often mistaken for success.
Opportunist alignment whether by artists or cultural figures often follows a predictable cycle: attach to political power, amplify that proximity, and convert it into exposure.
In the short term, it may work. Some gain platforms, bookings, funding opportunities, or media attention. But in the long term, it raises a deeper question: at what cost does relevance come when it is borrowed from political convenience rather than earned through consistent artistic integrity?
Politics and the Search for Useful Voices
Political movements, by their nature, seek visibility and influence across all sectors of society, including the arts. It is therefore not surprising that they gravitate toward artists who can amplify messaging, draw crowds, or add cultural legitimacy.
The African National Congress (ANC), as the dominant governing party since 1994, has had decades of experience navigating this relationship between culture and politics. Over time, it has learned how symbolic capital from artists can be useful in shaping public perception.
The Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), too, has experienced this dynamic at times benefiting from cultural endorsement, at other times being sidelined in the broader national narrative, only to find renewed relevance through selective cultural alignment.
More recently, newer political formations such as the Patriotic Alliance (PA) have entered the same terrain, actively engaging in cultural and entertainment spaces where visibility can be quickly converted into political traction. Whether this is strategic outreach or opportunistic absorption depends on one’s perspective but the pattern is consistent.
The Artist as Currency
What is often overlooked is how artists themselves become instruments in this exchange. Some willingly participate, understanding the transactional nature of attention. Others may enter the space believing it is simply networking or opportunity-building, only to find themselves politically branded.
In this ecosystem, ideology becomes flexible. Values become negotiable. Alignment becomes seasonal.
But the danger lies in the illusion that visibility equals legitimacy. An artist may trend today for political association and disappear tomorrow when the political winds shift. In such cases, exposure is not the same as sustainability.
The Cycle That Repeats
South Africa’s political landscape has always been dynamic, and with it, the cultural sector has been repeatedly pulled into political orbit. The cycle is familiar:
Political actors seek cultural legitimacy
Artists seek access, funding, or relevance
Temporary alignment is formed
Public attention is gained
Political winds shift
Relationships dissolve or are reconfigured
And then it begins again.
This cycle is not limited to any one party or group, it is systemic. It reflects a broader challenge in how culture is funded, valued, and instrumentalised in the post-1994 creative economy.
Integrity Versus Opportunism
The real tension is not between artists and politicians. It is between integrity and opportunism.
Artists who build long-term careers on craft, discipline, and authentic voice tend to outlast political cycles. Those who anchor themselves primarily to shifting political alliances often find themselves repeatedly rebranded or eventually discarded when their usefulness declines.
This is not a moral judgment as much as it is an observation of pattern.
Beyond the Wind
The cultural sector does not need fewer political interactions, it needs clearer boundaries. Engagement is not the problem; dependency is.
When artists become extensions of political branding exercises, they risk losing the very independence that gives their work meaning. And when politicians treat artists as temporary tools for visibility, they undermine the cultural ecosystem they claim to support.
The wind will always change direction. The question is: who is building something stable enough not to be blown with it?
.jpeg)
Comments