ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN MATTERS
What the Cultural and Creative Industries Cannot Afford to Ignore
In government, nothing of consequence happens by accident. Budgets are not spent randomly. Programmes are not implemented on goodwill. Priorities are not acted on because they “sound important”.
They happen because they are written into one document: the Annual Performance Plan (APP).
For too long, practitioners in the Cultural and Creative Industries have focused their energy on applications, protests, petitions, and social media outrage — while ignoring the one instrument that quietly determines whether their work will be funded, supported, monitored, or ignored for an entire financial year.
If arts and culture are not in the APP, they are not a priority. Full stop.
What Is an Annual Performance Plan (APP)?
An Annual Performance Plan is a legally binding planning document produced by every government department and public entity. It translates:
Government policy
Medium-Term Strategic Frameworks
Five-year Strategic Plans
into measurable commitments for a specific financial year.
In simple terms, the APP answers three critical questions:
What will the department do this year?
How will it do it?
How will success or failure be measured?
If a programme, project, or sector priority does not appear in the APP, it:
Will not be budgeted for properly
Will not be monitored
Will not be accounted for
Will not be protected when cuts happen
Why Practitioners Must Understand the APP
Many practitioners complain — often correctly — that:
Funding is inconsistent
Programmes are cancelled
Promises are not kept
Priorities shift with every new Minister or official
But the uncomfortable truth is this: most practitioners do not read the APP.
When the Cultural and Creative Industries are excluded from an APP, it means:
There are no performance indicators tied to the sector
Officials are not measured on delivery to artists
Parliamentary oversight is weakened
Funding becomes discretionary rather than strategic
Understanding the APP allows practitioners to move from emotional engagement to strategic pressure.
What It Means When the Sector Is Missing from the APP
When arts and culture priorities are not reflected in an APP, it signals several dangers:
The sector becomes invisible in planning cycles
Funding becomes ad hoc, not structural
Community arts, training, and development are treated as optional
Officials cannot be held accountable for non-delivery
It also means that when Parliament asks, “Why wasn’t this done?” the department can legally respond:
“It was not part of our approved Annual Performance Plan.”
That is how silence becomes policy.
The APP and the Three Spheres of Government
1. National Government
At national level, the APP:
Determines how arts and culture align with national priorities
Informs allocations to entities like NAC, NFVF, and others
Shapes conditional grants to provinces
If community arts, performers’ protection, or sector regulation are not in the national APP, provinces will struggle to justify spending on them — even if the need is obvious.
2. Provincial Government
Provincial APPs determine:
Funding to Community Arts Centres
Provincial programmes and festivals
Support for local practitioners
Relationships with municipalities
When arts priorities are weak or absent in provincial APPs:
Community arts become the first casualty of budget cuts
Infrastructure remains under-maintained
Programmes depend on political goodwill rather than planning
3. Local Government (Municipalities)
Municipal APPs (often linked to IDPs) are critical for:
Access to venues and facilities
Local cultural programming
Community-based employment opportunities
When arts and culture are not in municipal plans:
Venues are repurposed or neglected
Arts budgets disappear into “community services”
Practitioners are told to look to national government instead
This creates a cycle of displacement and blame across all three spheres.
Why APP Literacy Is a Form of Power
Reading and understanding the APP enables practitioners to:
Intervene before budgets are finalised
Make submissions grounded in government language
Hold officials accountable using their own targets
Strengthen advocacy beyond slogans and hashtags
It shifts the sector from reaction to strategy.
From Performance to Participation
The Cultural and Creative Industries cannot remain a sector that only performs but does not participate in governance processes.
If we want:
Regulation
Sustainable funding
Fair labour practices
Functional institutions
Then we must engage with the instruments that shape power — including the Annual Performance Plan.
The APP is not a bureaucratic document for officials.
It is a map of intention, a contract with the public, and a mirror of political priorities.
And the most dangerous place for the arts to be…
is outside that map.
A Final Question to the Sector
If we do not read the APP,
If we do not interrogate it,
If we do not challenge what is missing from it…
Who exactly are we expecting to fight for the Cultural and Creative Industries on our behalf?
The time to engage is before the financial year begins — not after the money is gone.


Comments